AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
In this case, recommending an adjustment of -48. The software tries to fit a curve to determine the ideal adjustment value, but because it can't test values past 20 on Nikon, it guesses the curve peak. 12 from the second.Ĭrazy recommendations when the lens needs close to the maximum adjustment value, e.g., my 85mm D requires a -19 on my D7100. Inconsistent results, e.g., recommended adjustment of -6 for the 35mm Art from the first run vs. Even if the product had worked perfectly the setup time and time spent entering and testing values for each lens far exceeds what it takes me to make adjustments using SpyderLensCal. They were very nice about it and offered to provide direct help, but I bought the software to cut down on the time I have to spend adjusting my lenses. Wasted all of last Sunday trying to get useful results out of it on my long lenses (Sigma 120-300 f2.8 and Nikon 500mm f4), and a couple of shorter ones (Nikon 85mm D, and Sigma 35mm Art). Is this software worth $100US or does the dot-tune technique to do adjustments work just as well? Asked other places - maybe someone can tell me:
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |